Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 08:10

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Et distinctio voluptatem magni repudiandae.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Kylie Jenner Makes Cheetah Print Airplane Sweats Look So Chic While Leaving Venice - instyle.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
SpaceX fires up Super Heavy booster ahead of Starship's 10th test flight (video) - Space
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What are the most outrageous violations of restaurant buffet etiquette have you seen?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
How does Bollywood influence Indian culture?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Powerful solar telescope unveils ultra-fine magnetic 'curtains' on the sun's surface - Space